Skip to content

Sustain­ability aspects in DCF valuation

Last update: April 22, 2025

A sustainably built and operated property typically has a higher market value than an otherwise identical property that does not or only partially meets sustain­ability require­ments (for example, if it is heated with fossil fuels instead of a heat pump). However, invest­ments in sustainable properties are usually higher. This simple comparison alone shows that the influence of sustain­ability factors on the market value of real estate is complex.

This paper addresses the question of how sustain­ability aspects, with an emphasis on energy renova­tions, are incor­po­rated into a valuation performed using the discounted cash flow (DCF) method. In any DCF valuation, the focus is on revenues, costs, and discounting. Each of these three parameters is influ­enced by factors related to sustain­ability. A selection of these will be presented here, beginning with the factors that influence property income.

Yields

Invest­ments in sustain­ability have a wide-ranging impact on earnings. Naturally, the poten­tially higher rental income is the most important factor.

  • Rental income from new leases: Properties heated with a heat pump generally have lower utility costs than those heated with fossil fuels. The current energy crisis – including the sharp rise in fossil fuel prices – boldly under­lines how much the heating source can influence utility costs. The C02 tax also has an impact here. For tenants, the gross rent (net rent plus ancillary costs) is decisive. The lower ancillary costs of sustainable properties enable owners to charge a higher net rent.
  • Rental income on new leases: In Switzerland, tenants of commercial properties whose sustain­ability perfor­mance is being monitored are willing to pay more.
    Rental income from existing tenants: The costs for energy-efficient renova­tions can be partially passed on to existing tenants, which generally increases the rent. According to Swiss residential tenancy law, the pass-through rate is generally higher when invest­ments are made in sustainable building compo­nents during renova­tions.
    Exit values of sustainable building compo­nents in terms of the circular economy: Currently, most building compo­nents are installed and bonded in such a way that they can hardly ever be reused. However, this will change in the future. There is a growing awareness of this issue and regula­tions concerning it are becoming increas­ingly prevalent.

Cost

On the cost side, the main factor is the higher investment required for measures that promote sustain­ability. However, government funding incen­tives help to reduce these costs.

  • Investment costs for sustainable building technology: Substi­tuting fossil fuels with renewable heating sources results in signif­i­cantly higher mainte­nance costs. For example, installing a heat pump is much more expensive than replacing an old oil heating system with a new one.
    Accom­pa­nying measures: How much higher the repair costs turn out to be for a heating system replacement depends on whether further invest­ments (such as additional insulation measures, under­floor heating, photo­voltaics, etc.) are necessary.
    Subsidies: Incen­tives reduce the costs of sustain­ability invest­ments.
  • Operating costs: Sustainable properties, and partic­u­larly renewable heating sources, typically generate lower operating costs. These savings pay for themselves over time. 
    Service life of sustainable building compo­nents: Sustainable building compo­nents are charac­terized by a longer service life. This means that major mainte­nance and repair costs can be saved over the entire life cycle.

Discounting

A lower expected return results in a lower discount rate, and this leads to a higher price in a DCF valuation.

Discounting/expected return: Investors are more willing to pay for sustainable real estate. Accord­ingly, they accept a lower return for owning a sustainable property than a non-sustainable one. Since renovation reduces the risk of a property becoming a stranded asset, the discount rate after a refur­bishment may be lower than before.

Recent empirical study 

A recent study by Wüest Partner provides infor­mation on the magnitude of such sustain­ability effects for Switzerland. Based on data from 2015 to 2020, the results are summa­rized in the graphic and text below.

Economic viability of an energetic renovation 
Wuest Partner

As a result, an investor pays on average around 4 percent less for an otherwise identical apartment building that is heated using fossil fuels than for one that is heated sustainably. The net rent of a rental apartment is, on average, 40 francs per apartment per month more expensive in a sustainably heated building. As illus­trated above, this is primarily due to the lower ancillary costs. However, the amorti­zation costs for installing a heat pump are higher than replacing an old heating system with a new oil or gas version. Since these amorti­zation costs only increase by 34 francs per apartment and month on average, owners can still expect a small profit. This is why investors accept a 10 basis point lower return for sustainable properties. Inciden­tally, in many cases the burden on tenants decreases nonetheless, since ancillary costs often fall more sharply than net rents.

You can find out more about this in the study ​​Effect of sustain­ability on real estate values (German), which Wüest Partner conducted in 2022 with the support of the Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN).  

Change and consis­tency

It is plausible that the willingness to pay for sustainable properties has increased further in the meantime. Finally, the terms “stranded assets” or “carbon value at risk” are gaining impor­tance among investors, and with the energy crisis, tenants are more aware of ancillary costs. In a valuation context, it is therefore important to remain constantly up to date. What has remained the same is that in a DCF valuation, the value-relevant aspects are assessed individ­ually by the valuer. In doing so, it is advan­ta­geous to be able to rely on current and compre­hensive bench­marks.

Bench­marks and simula­tions

Supporting the valuation process with substantive and reliable data is an important corner­stone in quality assurance. In order to take sustain­ability aspects into account objec­tively and in a value-relevant manner, it is necessary to expand tradi­tional valuation know-how. Wüest Partner makes this possible through internal and external training and knowledge transfer. On the other hand, statis­tical models (based on artificial intel­li­gence, for example) and compre­hensive bench­marks are crucial. This enables data-supported, objective proposals to be made in the valuation process. It also allows the evalu­ation to be broadly compared and supported. Obtaining quality-assured data to calculate bench­marks is critical in this regard. The more a company antic­i­pates the market, the earlier they can system­at­i­cally collect and store relevant data. In the area of building materi­al­ization, survey apps such as Wüest Visits are invaluable for achieving consid­erable accuracy in building-level databases (a digital twin). Especially in the area of renovation and the associated mainte­nance costs, an efficient DCF calcu­lation tool with a high degree of flexi­bility offers the possi­bility of evalu­ating energy scenarios in a wide range of varia­tions with little effort, both from an economic and an ecological perspective.

Outlook

Wüest Partner invests contin­u­ously in data and model devel­opment as well as knowledge acqui­sition in order to more accurately reflect sustain­ability aspects in valua­tions. For example, we are currently devel­oping a database to system­at­i­cally record potential subsidies for energy-efficient renova­tions. The example of the circular economy shows how dynam­i­cally the topic of assessment and sustain­ability is devel­oping: In today’s existing properties, the building compo­nents are usually glued together in such a way that recycling is rarely econom­i­cally worth­while. Now, however, more and more buildings are being constructed in such a way that their resources can be reused later. Accord­ingly, an “exit value” of building compo­nents could also occur in a few years. The service life of compo­nents will also become more important.

A holistic approach

This article focuses on the energy aspects of renovating investment properties. Of course, sustain­ability is a very compre­hensive topic. Other factors, such as the location of the property, are also signif­icant for example, those regarding induced mobility or stranded asset risk. Wüest Partner covers this more extensive assessment of sustain­ability using an ESG rating, which we primarily see as a tool that provides owners or investors with a holistic view of the property and sheds light on many new aspects. This allows measures to be evaluated compre­hen­sively and strategies to be imple­mented in their entirety. Objec­tivity and compa­ra­bility are of paramount impor­tance to Wüest Partner; the approx­i­mately 75 indicators are deter­mined by data and result in an implicit benchmark of the Swiss building stock.

Contact us for further insights

The authors