Skip to content

Renewal strategies and CO2 reduction for UBS “Sima”

Last update: September 10, 2024

The UBS Sima real estate fund, the largest in Switzerland, has for many years been inten­sively concerned with the issue of sustain­ability, partic­u­larly with the reduction of CO2 emissions from its existing properties. By 2050, Switzerland, and thus its entire building stock, must become CO2-neutral. UBS Sima sees itself as having a respon­si­bility to drive forward the reduction of green­house gas emissions while at the same time achieving the best possible return in the interests of investors — all in a forward-looking, systematic, strategic manner.

 Tradeoff between sustain­ability and profit

In the area of conflict between CO2 reduction and value devel­opment, Wüest Partner was commis­sioned to develop a strategic plan that not only takes into account the measures necessary to achieve the sustain­ability goals, but also includes econom­i­cally attractive utilization reserves. The decisive consid­er­ation was that the period up to 2050 covers just under 30 years and thus roughly an entire renovation cycle. During this period, all properties will be renovated once. This means that struc­tural measures will be necessary in all cases.

Gray emissions: A new look at costs and returns

A respon­sible approach to the issue of green­house gas emissions is only possible if both the emissions generated during operation are taken into account as well as the so-called gray emissions, i.e. those resulting from the construction measures. It was therefore part of the assignment to include these emissions when deter­mining the best possible strategy. The solution was to put a price on them. This price, together with the invest­ments, forms the cost side. On the revenue side are the economic added values, achieved thanks to the construction measures and the emissions saved.

Standard strategies

Four standard strategies are available for existing properties:

0. Contin­u­ation:

Verzicht auf jegliche baulichen Massnahmen. Diese Strategie kommt in Anbetracht des langen Zeitraums von 30 Jahren und des in dieser Zeit zu erreichenden des Netto-null-Ziels nicht infrage.

1. Energy renovation:

Replacement of  the fossil heat generator, insulation measures, and possibly a photo­voltaic system.

2. Extension:

Energy renovation of the existing buildings plus extension, annex, super­structure or additional construction. Only useful in the case of utilization reserves.

3. New replacement buildings:

Demolition of existing buildings plus new construction. Only sensible if the existing buildings are of a certain age and there are signif­icant utilization reserves.

Prior­i­ti­zation mechanism

In concrete terms, the task was to determine the best standard strategy (yield minus costs) for each property and the optimal time for its imple­men­tation. Since not all properties can be built, renovated, or expanded at the same time, a prior­i­ti­zation mechanism was developed that makes it possible to find an econom­i­cally and ecolog­i­cally sensible sequence for the imple­men­tation of the planned measures. This takes into account the avail­ability of financial resources (limited annual investment volume) and human resources, as well as the construc­tional require­ments.

“Social” and “Gover­nance” complete the ESG rating

The project is about to be completed. In the near future, it is to be expanded into a complete ESG rating: After focusing on component E (Environ­mental) to date, the next step will be to focus on the two other compo­nents S (Social) and G (Gover­nance).

Further infor­mation

The following article deals in detail with the renewal strategies outlined here:

Renovation strategies taking into account economics and ecology

For more articles on the link between real estate values and sustain­ability, see the following links:

Investor survey on the value relevance of sustain­ability

10 factors that influence the value of sustainable properties

Contact our experts to learn more